Many founders love to talk about building a self steering team. It sounds attractive you get fewer decisions on your plate, fewer fires to put out, and more people who can run with things without asking for your approval every hour. The problem is that self steering is often treated like a vibe instead of a discipline. The healthiest self steering teams I have seen in Malaysia, Singapore, and the Gulf did not appear by accident. They were built intentionally, with more clarity and structure than most founders are comfortable admitting.
The first ingredient is direction that is painfully clear. A self steering team is not guided by a motivational phrase on the wall, but by a shared, specific understanding of what winning means in the next few months. People can describe the revenue targets, the user outcomes, or the product milestones in simple language, without opening a deck or a Notion page. They also understand the non negotiables of the business. They know which customers you will walk away from, which shortcuts you refuse to take, and which compromises on quality or data are never acceptable. The team has real freedom, but that freedom lives inside well defined guardrails. Without that, self steering turns into random motion.
Inside that clear direction, ownership needs to be boringly explicit. In a true self steering team, every important area has a name on it, not a committee. One person owns activation, another owns retention, another holds responsibility for operational reliability, another for hiring in a specific function. Collaboration still happens, but when something slips, everyone knows who is answerable and who gets the final call. When you ask three people who owns a particular outcome and all three say that they do, you are not looking at a self steering team at all. You are looking at a group project where accountability will always land back on you.
The next characteristic is that accountability flows sideways, not just upward. In many young startups, team members only feel responsible to the founder. In a self steering team, people are just as willing to hold their peers accountable. Someone in product tells the growth lead that shipping something halfway will damage churn. An engineer reminds the sales team that they promised a feature last sprint and asks what blocked it. Instead of waiting for the founder to play bad cop, people understand that calling out risks and inconsistencies is part of their job description. This kind of culture only appears when feedback is normal, when disagreement is not treated as disloyalty, and when people genuinely believe that speaking up protects the team rather than betraying it.
For this peer accountability to work, information has to be easy to find and easy to understand. A self steering team cannot operate in a fog. They do not waste hours digging through scattered channels, outdated spreadsheets, and forgotten slide decks just to understand how the business is doing. Key metrics, roadmaps, and decisions live in a small number of simple, visible places, refreshed on a reliable rhythm. When people can see how their work affects the numbers and the customers, they are far more willing to make decisions without running back to you for validation. Transparent information is not a nice to have. It is the dashboard of the car you expect them to steer.
Closely linked to that is clarity around decision rights. In many early stage teams, everyone is told they are empowered, yet nobody is sure what they are actually allowed to decide. In self steering teams, there is an unwritten ladder that everyone understands. Individual contributors can decide how to hit an agreed target inside their lane. Team leads can make tradeoffs inside their domain. Only founders and senior leaders commit the company to big bets such as pricing changes, major shifts in product strategy, or entering a new market. Once that ladder is clear, people stop freezing. They know when they should decide alone, when they should consult, and when something must be escalated.
Despite the word self in self steering, these teams are not allergic to structure. In fact, they depend on a simple, consistent operating rhythm. There are regular rituals that almost never move. A weekly planning session where priorities and owners are confirmed. One or two short check ins during the week to surface blockers early. A monthly retrospective where the team looks honestly at what broke and asks which system failed rather than which individual to blame. Predictable rhythm creates stability. People plan their effort around these touchpoints. The structure quietly carries much of the coordination work that used to exhaust the founder.
Another defining trait of self steering teams is the way they balance psychological safety and performance. The two are treated as partners, not enemies. It is safe for someone to admit they are stuck or that they made a mistake. It is not safe to repeatedly drop the ball and shrug. Team members know they will not be mocked or punished for raising issues, but they also know they will be challenged to learn from those issues. They feel free to disagree with founders and leads, yet they are expected to bring data or clear reasoning when they do. When psychological safety exists without standards, performance decays. When standards dominate without safety, people shut down and wait to be told what to do. Self steering cannot survive either extreme.
The hiring philosophy behind these teams looks different as well. Instead of chasing heroes who create drama and solve crises with last minute heroics, leaders deliberately look for adults. These are people who can manage themselves, be realistic about their bandwidth, communicate proactively when they are overloaded, and separate their work from their need for constant praise. In markets like Southeast Asia and the Middle East, where family and social obligations can be intense, this kind of maturity also includes being honest about those constraints instead of over promising and then vanishing when life gets complicated. Heroes make for good stories in investor meetings, but they rarely build reliable systems. Adults do.
As the team becomes more capable, the founder’s role has to evolve. In a self steering setup, the founder is no longer the chief firefighter or the answer key for every question. Instead, they act as a system designer. They care deeply about the business, but they focus on building an environment where the right decisions are easier to make and the wrong decisions are harder. They invest their energy in giving context, sharpening constraints, and pruning distractions rather than micromanaging tasks. When something breaks, they resist the urge to swoop in and fix it by themselves. They ask what process, norm, or expectation failed and they strengthen that instead. The team learns not only what to do but how to think.
Finally, self steering teams share a language for tradeoffs. They can talk openly about speed versus quality, short term revenue versus long term scalability, cash today versus strategic positioning tomorrow, without turning it into a personal attack. Some teams create shorthand phrases for the patterns they see. They might warn each other about opportunities that are sweet in the short term but painful in the long term. They might distinguish clearly between experiments that are meant to be killed quickly and commitments that must be honoured at almost any cost. This shared language lets them make complex decisions faster and with less drama, because everyone understands the pattern they are discussing.
All of these characteristics might sound neat and theoretical, but in practice they are deeply confronting for founders. To build a self steering team, you have to give up the identity of being the only driver who can be trusted with the wheel. You have to share more information than feels comfortable. You have to tolerate short term pain while people learn to decide without you. You have to hire people who will challenge you, refuse to worship you, and occasionally tell you that your favourite idea is a distraction. Many founders say they want self steering, but what they actually want is obedience with initiative. The two are not the same.
If you are early stage and this vision feels distant, you do not need to transform your whole company overnight. Start with one contained area. It could be customer support, social media, or onboarding. Choose one owner, give them a clear outcome, provide all the information and decision rights they need, and agree on a simple check in rhythm. Stay close enough to coach, but far enough to let them wrestle with real responsibility. That one experiment will teach you more about your own control habits and your team’s readiness than any leadership book.
Over time, as more areas develop clear ownership, peer accountability, transparent information, and a shared language about tradeoffs, you will notice something subtle. The characteristics of a self steering team will no longer live in your org chart or your values page. They will live in how people behave on bad days. You will see colleagues push each other on quality without waiting for you. You will witness important decisions being made in rooms where you are not present and you will not feel panic, because the direction, the guardrails, and the rhythm are already in place. That is the real promise of a self steering team. It does not erase you from the story, but it allows the story to continue, even when you step away.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
