In many organisations today, the lateral move has become the modern cure for almost every career ache. Feeling stuck in your current role. Move sideways. Not getting promoted this cycle. Move sideways. Want to stay visible during a restructuring. Again, move sideways. The language around these moves is flattering. You are called agile, cross functional, a team player, someone who can be dropped into any situation and still deliver. On paper, it looks like you are building range and resilience. Yet over time, a long chain of lateral moves can quietly limit your long term options, even as it earns you praise in the short term.
Early in your career, broad exposure can be powerful. A move from operations into strategy, or from a head office role to a frontline market, can dramatically change how you understand the business. In some ecosystems, such as consulting heavy environments in London or fast growing hubs like Dubai, people who have seen multiple sides of the business are often respected. The problem is not with breadth itself, but with what happens when breadth never matures into a clear, focused story. After too many shifts at the same level, your CV can start to look like a collection of disconnected assignments rather than a deliberate journey toward a defined leadership lane.
From the outside, recruiters and senior leaders are trying to answer a very simple question. What are you outstanding at, and what would you own on day one. A first lateral move from brand management into e commerce can be positioned as a smart pivot into digital. A second transition from e commerce into transformation can still make sense if the narrative is framed around building a future ready profile. By the fourth or fifth side step, especially if the roles sit in unrelated teams or functions, you risk looking less like a high potential leader being groomed for a specific destination and more like someone who solves short term staffing gaps. Instead of being seen as a specialist with a rising trajectory, you become the person who floats between units to fix problems, without a clear long term role waiting at the end of that flexibility.
Promotion committees do not read your history as a personal growth story. They scan it for signals of risk and readiness. They ask whether you can handle larger teams, whether you can sustain performance when pressure rises, whether you are ready to be put in front of regulators, investors, or key clients. When your lateral moves keep you at the same band for many years, even if the underlying work becomes more complex, the dominant impression is one of reliability without momentum. You look essential in the middle of the organisation, not inevitable at the top.
This perception triggers a very specific dynamic. Once you are known as the person who can stabilise messy situations, you are often the first name mentioned when a region underperforms, a product line struggles, or a key leader walks out unexpectedly. You are trusted to step in, take charge informally, and keep things running until the storm passes. This is valuable work, but it does not automatically translate into promotion. The conversation in the room shifts from a push to elevate you into a new level, to repeated reliance on you to rescue another team one more time. Your versatility becomes a reason to reuse you at the same level, not to move you up.
There is also a quieter cost in the external market. Your negotiating power depends not only on your current responsibilities, but also on how rare and attractive your profile looks to other employers. A long list of lateral moves inside one firm can make this harder to assess. If your title does not change for several cycles, headhunters may read your story as stalled even if your remit grew significantly behind the scenes. If your roles are tailored to the unique politics, systems, or structure of one company, it becomes difficult to map you neatly into standard job frameworks elsewhere. Moves that felt strategic internally can look like sideways drift from the outside, particularly when the titles do not reflect the scale of the work.
Compensation is often affected in the same way. Every time you agree to a lateral move without pushing for a clear structural upgrade, you quietly teach the organisation something about your elasticity. You signal that you will absorb new complexity and risk in exchange for intangible rewards such as exposure, visibility, or vague promises about being “in line” for future roles. Later, when you decide that you want a meaningful increase in pay or seniority, those past decisions become anchors. Leaders will compare your current demands to how easily you accepted lateral terms before, and may struggle to justify a sudden jump.
Another hidden danger is becoming what might be called an organisational shock absorber. Every large company has a small group of people who are parachuted into difficult contexts. A failing country operation, a product launch that has gone sideways, a team demoralised by previous leadership. If you are consistently deployed into these roles, your CV will accumulate phrases like “cleaned up”, “stabilised”, “reset” or “prepared the unit for transition”. These are important contributions, but they are also hard to quantify and even harder to connect to the crisp, numerical indicators that promotion committees like to see. Meanwhile, colleagues who stay in one unit and grow in relatively stable conditions collect simple metrics that are easy to showcase. Revenue growth, margin improvement, headcount scale, engagements with the board or with regulators. Their path may have been less turbulent than yours, but from a distance their story is cleaner and therefore easier to reward.
Living as a shock absorber also takes an emotional toll. You can find yourself repeatedly stepping into high friction roles without the formal authority that normally accompanies that level of responsibility. Over time, it becomes easy to feel burnt out, cynical, or detached from your own aspirations. You develop a strong sense of how to keep the wider system functioning, yet your individual trajectory remains vague. You are trusted to protect the health of the organisation, but no one seems to be actively curating the health of your career.
The impact of lateral moves is shaped by geography and corporate culture too. In some European multinationals, for example, well designed rotation programmes bring high potential talent through two or three lateral roles as part of a deliberate path into senior general management. The structure is clear, the promotions are mapped in advance, and the organisation is explicit about who is on that track. In that context, lateral moves are not random; they are steps in a visible staircase.
In other environments, particularly in fast changing Gulf or wider MENA firms, lateral moves are often more ad hoc. New roles appear quickly as the business expands; existing teams are reshuffled to respond to new priorities. Titles sometimes lag behind the actual responsibility, and formal hierarchy may not catch up for several years. If you say yes to repeated lateral moves in these settings without negotiating for structure and clarity, you can wake up one day to discover that you manage cross border teams and large budgets while still carrying a mid level title. Your work would justify a promotion in a more rigid market, but your label has not kept pace.
For professionals who move across markets, this mismatch can be particularly awkward. Experience that looks impressive in Dubai or Riyadh may not translate neatly into grading systems in London, Singapore, or Frankfurt if the title, tenure, and scope do not fit the benchmarks used there. Recruiters seldom have the time to decode every unique organisational chart. They read your title, your years in grade, and the pattern of your moves. If these elements do not align with their internal templates, your profile may never make it past the first screen no matter how rich the substance underneath.
None of this means that lateral moves are always harmful. They can be extremely useful when they are rare, intentional, and anchored to a clear horizon. A sideways move into a growth business can be valuable if that unit is close to the future engine of the company. Joining a digital channel, a new geography, or an innovation focused function may open doors that a promotion in a legacy area cannot. The key is to ensure that the move answers a long term question, not only a short term discomfort in your current seat.
For a lateral move to support long term growth, three conditions matter. First, it should strengthen your long term narrative. You should be able to explain in one or two sentences how this role fits into the kind of leadership position you eventually want. Second, it should be accompanied by explicit discussions about what comes next. You need clarity about what success will look like over the next eighteen to twenty four months, which roles you would be considered for after that, and who will actively sponsor that step. Third, the move should make sense not only within your current firm, but also in the wider labour market. The title, scope, and responsibilities should be legible to someone who has never worked in your organisation.
Ultimately, the problem is not that your career contains lateral moves. Most interesting careers do. The deeper question is whether those moves form a coherent line toward a destination, or whether they are simply a series of reactions to immediate pressures and opportunities. If your CV reads like a catalogue of firefighting assignments, it may be time to slow down and choose more deliberately. Think about the seat you would like to be considered for when the next senior role opens, whether inside your current organisation or elsewhere. Then evaluate every potential lateral move against that imagined seat. Does this shift make it easier for others to picture you there, or does it mainly make you more convenient in the present.
There is a structural tension built into corporate life. Organisations value adaptable talent in the middle, because it helps them absorb shocks and keep operations running smoothly. Individuals, however, need compounding authority and clearer decision rights as they advance, or they risk plateauing. Lateral moves can help you build a richer base of experience, but only if they are chosen with discipline. When moving sideways becomes your standard response to feeling overlooked or restless, it stops being a thoughtful strategy and starts becoming a mask for stalled progress. The challenge is to keep your flexibility without losing your direction, so that the story others read from your CV points upward as well as across.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
