In many companies, lateral moves are treated almost like impulse buys. A role appears that looks fresh and interesting, your current team feels a little stagnant, and an internal recruiter mentions “great exposure” and “new stakeholders.” Before you fully think it through, you are exploring a sideways move that keeps your level and title the same but promises a different environment. Months later, you might find that your scope is murkier, your promotion path is less clear, and people are unsure how to read your trajectory.
The problem is rarely the lateral move itself. The problem is a lateral move that is not planned with the same seriousness you would give to a promotion or an external job change. If you want to plan lateral moves without harming your career progress, you have to be very clear about what you are trying to build, what the new role can offer, and how the story will look to future decision makers.
A helpful starting point is to define your through line. This is the underlying theme that connects the roles you take. Some people want to be known for deep expertise in a specific domain, such as growth, data, risk, or operations. Others are intentionally building breadth and want to become strong generalist leaders who can handle multiple functions or markets. Some are assembling a skill stack that combines unusual strengths, like content with analytics, or policy with product. Whatever your direction, a lateral move should reinforce that through line rather than blur it.
Once you understand your through line, your career starts to look more like a roadmap than a random walk. Each role you take should extend your capabilities, remove a constraint, or position you closer to an engine of growth inside the company. A lateral move into a team that owns a strategic product line, sits close to key decision makers, and forces you to build a missing skill can be more valuable than a minor promotion in a sleepy corner of the business. On the other hand, a lateral move into a low leverage team that mostly reacts to crises, has little autonomy, and is invisible to leadership can quietly slow you down.
To avoid that trap, you have to look beyond titles and ask different questions about any potential move. One set of questions is about business impact. Does this team clearly touch revenue, margin, user growth, or a critical cost line, and is that impact visible to leadership. Another set is about proximity to the company’s growth engines. Is this group working on new markets, monetisation, AI, key partnerships, or some other strategic bet, or is it supporting legacy work that the company will slowly wind down. A third area is skill development. Can you realistically leave this role with at least one capability that is rare in your peer group and can be demonstrated with numbers, projects, or outcomes rather than vague language. Finally, there is narrative coherence. Can you explain in a couple of clear sentences why you moved into this role and how it fits the direction you are heading.
If you cannot tell that story cleanly, others will make up their own version. Hiring managers and senior leaders are often too busy to dig for context, so they rely on simple patterns. A lateral move that does not make sense at first glance can easily be misread as a sign that you plateaued, that there were performance issues, or that you were escaping conflict. That is why narrative work is part of the planning, not an afterthought. You should be able to say something like: “I spent several years optimising the consumer funnel. I realised my biggest blind spot was how partnerships shape acquisition, so I moved into a role that owns partner integrations. Now I understand both sides of the growth engine.” A story like that makes your move look deliberate and strategic rather than reactive.
Before you commit, it is often wiser to test the direction you are considering. Instead of jumping straight into a new team, you can treat the move as an experiment. Take on cross functional projects with the destination team, volunteer to lead an initiative that mirrors their work, or shadow their rituals and reviews. This gives you information about whether the work energises you, whether your style fits their culture, and how the team is perceived by leadership. It also lets them see how you operate, which matters more than what is written in your internal profile. When it finally comes time to apply for the role, you are no longer just a name in a system. You are the person who already delivered something meaningful with them.
Timing also plays a bigger role than many people realise. Moving just before a performance review, right before a major launch is credited, or in the middle of a known promotion window can be costly. You want at least one recent, well documented achievement anchored in your current role before you move. That anchor gives evaluators something solid to hold onto when they look at your profile later, even if your first cycle in the new team is messy or focused on ramp up. Think of it as locking in a chapter before you start writing the next one.
The way you talk about the move with your current manager is another important piece of the puzzle. If you present your decision as a verdict on the team or a complaint about your experience, you risk turning a potential sponsor into a quiet critic. If you present it as a step in a long term plan that also honours what you have learned under them, you are more likely to keep their support. A constructive conversation sounds something like this: you share the long term skill stack you are trying to build, acknowledge what you have gained in your current role, highlight the gap you see, and explain why the other role would help you fill it. Then you ask for their perspective and, where appropriate, their backing. Even managers who are not thrilled to lose you often respect a thoughtful, strategic approach.
Planning also means being honest about what you want to avoid. A lateral move that isolates you from decision makers, removes clear ownership of metrics, or places you in a team known internally as a dumping ground for politics is almost always a drag on your progress. So is a pattern of frequent lateral moves that are not attached to visible outcomes. If you hop across teams every year or so without leaving a trail of measurable impact, it becomes difficult for future managers to trust that you can carry something from start to finish. They may see you as restless, unfocused, or driven mainly by personal comfort rather than business needs.
At the same time, some lateral moves that look neutral or negative on paper can be quietly powerful. Moving into a slightly narrower role so that you can work with a higher calibre manager, join a faster growing product line, or operate in a market with more upside can be a net win. In many companies, especially larger ones, the most interesting promotions often emerge from teams that are working on strategic bets rather than mature products. A move into that environment might initially feel like a sideways or even slight backward step, but over a few years it can compound into bigger opportunity. The key is to verify that the ladder above that role is real. You can do this by asking where people from that team have gone in the last couple of promotion cycles and whether they have moved into stronger positions.
Another useful habit is to carry a “portable scoreboard” with you. Before you leave your current role, you should crystallise your achievements into a small set of clear metrics, stories, and artifacts. That might mean documenting revenue uplift, cost savings, reliability improvements, or adoption numbers; collecting examples of strategies you led; or saving final versions of playbooks, documents, and analyses you authored, within what is allowed by company policy. These become the proof points you lean on later when your first months in the new role are focused on learning, building relationships, and laying foundations that are not yet visible as big wins.
Networking and visibility inside the organisation should be part of the plan as well. A lateral move is smoother when people in the new area have already encountered your thinking. Joining relevant working groups, contributing to internal documents, presenting at cross team reviews, and being active in shared channels allows colleagues to see how you solve problems long before you apply to work with them. When you finally raise your hand for a move, they are not just reading your résumé. They remember your contributions and can picture how you would fit.
In the end, the purpose of a lateral move is not novelty for its own sake. It is leverage. If a move does not improve your position on at least one of three fronts - scope, skill rarity, or strategic positioning - it is unlikely to help your career, no matter how interesting the day to day sounds. If it clearly improves two of these areas, you can usually justify a slower promotion or even a temporary pause in pay growth. If it strengthens all three, that sideways step can end up accelerating your trajectory more than a modest title bump in a weak lane.
When you treat your career as something you design rather than something that happens to you, lateral moves stop feeling risky by default. They become deliberate bets that you make with open eyes. You keep your through line intact, you choose roles that add to your capability and credibility, and you make sure the story others see is the same one you intend to tell. Over time, that deliberate planning is what allows you to move sideways without losing momentum, and often to move farther and faster than if you had stayed on a single, rigid track.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
