In Malaysia, stories of abandoned parents used to be whispered in coffeeshops and family gatherings. An uncle would mention an elderly neighbour who suddenly appeared in a welfare home. An aunt would quietly move into a charity run facility with a single suitcase and no explanation. These stories felt distant, like tragedies that happened somewhere else. Today, they arrive directly on our screens. A nurse posts about an old patient whose children never come back after admission. A community activist uploads a photo of a frail auntie waiting by the hospital counter, long after visiting hours end. Reports of hundreds of seniors being left in hospitals every year no longer read like dry statistics. They feel like an uncomfortable mirror showing how easily some parents become invisible once they stop being financially useful.
Whenever one of these stories goes viral, the online conversation is intense and predictable. Some people blame “children these days” for lacking values. Others explain that not every parent was loving, and that some adult children are already crushed by rising costs and stagnant wages. There are those who insist that this is purely a matter of conscience and religion, while others argue that it may be time for law to step in. Somewhere in the argument, a familiar suggestion appears. Maybe Malaysia should introduce something like a Maintenance of Parents Act, a legal framework that requires children who can afford it to support their ageing parents.
Across the causeway, such a law already exists. In Singapore, the Maintenance of Parents Act allows residents aged sixty and above who cannot support themselves to apply for financial maintenance from their adult children if those children are able but unwilling to help. The cases go to a dedicated tribunal that starts with mediation and only issues a payment order when other options fail. It does not guarantee affection, nor does it force anyone to be a loving child. What it does is recognise, in legal language, a duty that many Asian families already treat as a moral expectation. Children are supposed to care for their parents in old age. When that duty breaks down completely, the state can nudge those who have walked away.
Malaysia, by contrast, still occupies an uncomfortable grey area. There is strong cultural and religious pressure to care for elders, and there are general legal principles that can sometimes be stretched to cover maintenance issues. However, there is no single, clear civil law that says elderly parents have a specific right to claim financial support from adult children who are able to provide it. The country relies heavily on norms, on religious guidance, and on informal negotiation within families. For parents who find themselves abandoned or neglected in old age, this legal vagueness can be a serious problem.
At the same time, Malaysia is growing older much faster than its public imagination admits. Many of us still picture the country as young and energetic, filled with students and fresh graduates. Demographic data tells another story. The share of people aged sixty and above has already crossed into double digits and is still rising. Within the next couple of decades, Malaysia is expected to become an aged society, with a much larger proportion of older citizens living longer lives. In daily life, this shows up as more parents living with chronic illnesses, more elderly individuals living alone after their spouses die, and more working adults trying to handle childcare, rising rents, and elderly care all at once.
For seniors who can no longer work and who have limited savings, this reality feels very sharp. Applications for government assistance among older Malaysians have climbed, hinting at a system under strain. When family support is strong, parents and children find ways to manage, even if the solutions are rough. When relationships have broken down or when children simply wash their hands of responsibility, the options become painful. Some older people rely on charity. Some quietly suffer in unsafe conditions. Others end up in hospitals or welfare homes, essentially handed to the state with no plan.
It is in this context that a Maintenance of Parents style law enters the conversation. A dedicated Act would give elderly parents a specific and affordable route to seek financial support from adult children who genuinely can afford to help but refuse to do so. Instead of navigating expensive, complex legal routes or begging relatives to intervene, they would have access to a tribunal that mediates and, where necessary, orders maintenance. This is not about turning every family argument into a lawsuit. It is about creating a clear, last resort pathway for situations where all other bridges have burnt down.
Supporters of the idea also point out that such a law could help the state allocate scarce welfare resources more fairly. As Malaysia’s population ages, public spending on healthcare, housing and social support will inevitably rise. If there is no way to require capable adult children to contribute to their parents’ basic needs, the state ends up absorbing costs even in situations where families could share the burden. A Maintenance of Parents framework, if designed thoughtfully, could ensure that welfare funds are prioritised for seniors who have no family or whose children are genuinely struggling, rather than for those whose children simply choose not to be involved.
There is a symbolic side to all of this too. Turning filial duty into law sends a message that the country is willing to back its cultural values with real consequences. For decades, Malaysians have spoken with pride about filial piety, the idea that children owe a debt of gratitude and care to their parents. Yet when a parent is abandoned or left without support, the response often stops at moral scolding. A law would not magically create loving families, but it would signal that total abandonment is not just disappointing behaviour. It is something the state takes seriously enough to address.
Critics, however, raise important concerns, many of which echo through casual conversations at mamak stalls and family dinners. What happens to adult children who grew up with abusive or neglectful parents. Are they now forced to send money to people who caused them real harm. What about those in the so called sandwich generation, young parents already juggling debts, childcare costs and shaky employment. Will a Maintenance of Parents Act punish people who are themselves hanging on by a thread.
These worries are not trivial. If Malaysia were to introduce such a law, it would have to come with thoughtful safeguards. Mediation processes would need to be sensitive to histories of violence and emotional abuse, not just financial capability. Mechanisms would need to be in place for tribunals to recognise situations where compelling an adult child to pay would deepen trauma rather than resolve neglect. Means testing would have to be designed carefully, so that struggling families are not shamed or further impoverished for failing to meet unrealistic expectations. The law should not become a blunt instrument that traps victims in new forms of obligation.
Scholars and advocates also warn against treating a Maintenance of Parents Act as a magic solution. If the national conversation focuses only on punishing unfilial children, it can distract from other urgent issues in elder care. Malaysia still needs stronger protections against elder abuse, clearer standards for welfare homes, better community based care options, and long term plans for healthcare financing as chronic conditions become more common. A well designed Maintenance of Parents law would be one part of a broader Senior Citizens framework, not a replacement for it.
Even with these challenges, there are compelling reasons for Malaysia to take the idea seriously. One of them is visibility. When parents are forced to file formal claims for maintenance, the resulting data can reveal patterns that are otherwise hidden. Policymakers can learn which regions experience the most neglect, how gender shapes caregiving burdens, and how income levels influence whether parents are supported or abandoned. This information can guide more targeted interventions in housing, healthcare, and social services for older adults.
Another reason is honesty about changing family structures. The traditional picture of multiple children living close to their parents, ready to share caregiving duties, is becoming less common. Many young Malaysians move for work, live in small apartments, or simply cannot provide hands on care. Others carry emotional wounds from childhood that make close contact with parents impossible. Pretending that the old script of automatic filial care still applies to everyone is unfair to both parents and children. A Maintenance of Parents Act confronts this gap openly. It does not pretend that love alone will fill it. It acknowledges that responsibility sometimes needs legal backing when culture and conscience fall short.
Ultimately, the question of whether Malaysia should consider such an Act is really a question about the kind of social contract the country wants between generations. If the answer is that parents are entirely on their own once their children become adults, then the current patchwork of informal expectations might be enough. If the answer is that society has a stake in ensuring that older people are not left destitute or abandoned, then clearer legal structures become harder to avoid.
A Malaysian version of a Maintenance of Parents Act would not have to be a copy of Singapore’s law. It could be shaped to reflect Malaysia’s multiracial, multi faith context, its economic realities, and its diverse family structures. It could give religious courts clearer tools where appropriate, while offering civil routes that are accessible to all. It could prioritise mediation and reconciliation where possible, and provide strong protections where relationships are too damaged to repair. What it cannot do is guarantee tenderness, gratitude, or the warmth of a child holding an ageing parent’s hand at the clinic. No law can manufacture those things. What it can do is recognise that in a rapidly ageing country, leaving parental care entirely to chance and private conscience is no longer enough. Considering a Maintenance of Parents Act is not about forcing love. It is about admitting that when love fails, parents should still have one last doorway they can walk through, without needing a viral video to be seen.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
