For much of 2022 and 2023, plastic was the pressure valve for rising prices and deferred travel plans. That phase is ending. The turn is visible in several places at once. The Federal Reserve’s June release shows revolving credit rose at a 0.7 percent annual rate in the second quarter, a sharp comedown from the pace seen during the reopening years, while total consumer credit grew 2.3 percent. Slower revolving credit is an early sign that households are choosing not to add to card balances at the same clip, a choice that aligns with cooler goods demand and a more cautious spending mix in mid-2025.
The headline that Americans Pull Back From an Epic Credit-Card Binge captures both the behavior and its breadth. Reporting in mid-August points to back-to-back monthly declines in card debt into June and a notable shift underneath the surface: credit card spending is now growing more slowly than debit spending for the first sustained stretch in years. That pattern reverses the 2022 dynamic when credit vastly outpaced debit. Visa and Mastercard aggregates referenced in coverage show debit up by a stronger margin in the first half of 2025, indicating households are still transacting, but leaning away from revolving debt that compounds at elevated rates.
The cooling is not happening in a vacuum. Interest costs are high by historical standards and remain the critical channel shaping behavior. Across new card offers tracked by independent surveys, the average APR sits near the mid-20s, while Federal Reserve series covering accounts assessed interest put averages in the low-20s as at early 2025. Even without another rate hike, those levels are punitive enough to change choices at the margin. Consumers have not forgotten the cumulative squeeze of 2022 and 2023, and issuers have not relaxed pricing. The result is a slower willingness to revolve balances and a stronger preference for debit or for installment products with clearer payoff paths.
Policy and regulation add context. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s attempt to cap late fees at 8 dollars, which would have trimmed a meaningful source of ancillary cost for many borrowers, was vacated by a federal court in April. Whatever the policy intent, the legal outcome preserves the fee environment that borrowers face when they stumble, and therefore keeps the behavioral incentive to avoid revolving at all. Behavioral finance is simple here. When interest and penalties are both sticky, borrowers either pay down faster or transact on debit. The legal clarity also reduces near-term uncertainty for issuers, which can sustain margins even as loan growth cools.
Bank and bureau data corroborate a gentle improvement in credit health through the second quarter. The delinquency rate on credit card loans at commercial banks was 3.05 percent in Q2 2025, down from last year’s highs, while the net charge-off rate fell for a third consecutive quarter to 4.17 percent. Equifax’s National Market Pulse indicates bank-card delinquencies continued a downward trend into mid-year. These are not cycle lows, and they do not erase stress in other categories such as autos and mortgages, but they do indicate that lenders and cardholders are not losing control of the revolving credit channel. Stabilization tends to arrive first in flow measures such as 30-plus delinquencies and charge-offs and only later in stock measures such as balances. That is what the current sequence suggests.
The New York Fed’s household debt report adds a further layer. Aggregate delinquency remained elevated in Q2, with student loans showing the clearest strain as deferred reporting rolled back in. The cross-portfolio pattern matters. Where stress is most visible is not where the pullback is occurring. Households appear to be triaging across liabilities, protecting daily spending capacity by keeping card accounts current, while allowing stress to surface in longer-amortizing products that have already repriced. The implication is that card behavior is a leading indicator of caution rather than a sign of distress.
Real-time spending trackers reinforce the idea that this is a compositional shift rather than a collapse. Bank of America’s Consumer Checkpoint shows a weak May and June followed by a firmer July, with total card spending per household up 1.8 percent year over year in July. The mix favors services and essentials over big-ticket goods. Within that pattern, debit taking share from credit is consistent with households continuing to spend, but choosing cash-like rails to avoid interest accrual. Policymakers will treat this as welcome normalization rather than contraction, because it reduces the risk of interest-cost spirals without undercutting consumption entirely.
It is also useful to separate the spending story from the underwriting story. Lenders tightened standards through 2023 and early 2024 and have been careful about line management since. With charge-offs still above pre-pandemic norms even after the recent ebb, there is no strong reason for issuers to chase volume with looser limits or lower APR margins. The Federal Reserve’s charge-off and delinquency series show improvement, but not a return to the unusually benign pre-2020 regime. Issuers will keep pricing disciplined until they see several quarters of clean performance, which means households face a prolonged period where revolving is simply expensive and unappealing.
What should readers infer for their own plans. First, the macro pivot is not an alarm. It is a sign that many households are shifting away from debt that compounds unpredictably and toward payment modes that preserve cash flow clarity. If you recognize that pattern in your own transactions, you are moving in the same direction as the aggregate. Second, the policy environment is not delivering immediate relief on card costs. The late-fee cap is off the table for now, and while some lawmakers continue to advocate hard APR caps, those proposals remain just that. Planning assumptions should treat card borrowing as a high-cost bridge, not a steady finance pillar, and should prioritize payoff sequencing that neutralizes interest first.
Third, the data imply that better card health can coexist with pockets of stress elsewhere. Even as card delinquencies eased in the second quarter in bureau and bank series, other categories saw late-stage delinquencies edge higher, and average credit scores ticked down slightly in July according to one national index. The picture is one of consumers retrenching where costs are most visible and flexible, while absorbing pressure where obligations are larger and pricing is fixed. For household balance sheets, that is a rational defense. For policy, it argues for targeted relief or clarity where legacy debts are driving the strain.
The behavioral shift also shows up in card network commentary and issuer disclosures. Coverage of network performance ahead of July earnings emphasized steady volumes rather than acceleration, with analysts focused on travel and discretionary categories as the swing factors. Banks with large card portfolios have guided that charge-offs should trend down from first-quarter peaks before settling above pre-pandemic averages, which is another way of saying the industry is past the worst phase of normalization but has not returned to the comfort of 2018 or 2019. In such an environment, there is no commercial incentive to push unsecured revolving credit growth aggressively.
On the ground, the reversion toward debit has a simple household logic. Debit arrests the compounding issue and turns spending decisions into real-time budget calls. In the aggregate data cited above, that shows up as a slower climb in revolving balances and modestly improved flow measures of card stress. It also shows up in bank account metrics. Bank of America’s spring and early summer checkpoints noted a stabilization and even a small uptick in median checking and savings balances after an extended drawdown. When households feel that balances are not bleeding, they are more inclined to reduce reliance on costly credit and to plan purchases more deliberately.
There are two important caveats. First, the U.S. remains a card-centric economy compared with peer markets, and high-income households are still propping up service-led spending. That means a renewed upswing is possible if financing costs fall and confidence improves. Second, the path of rates matters. If the Federal Reserve begins cutting in the coming months and issuers pass some of that through, the gap between debit and credit behavior could narrow. Until then, the price signal is doing the work that regulation did not. Households are not abandoning cards, but they are treating them as a transactional tool rather than a rolling credit line.
It helps to compare the present to the reopening burst. In 2022, rewards accrual, pent-up travel demand, and the last of excess savings pushed credit usage to grow much faster than debit. Today, with rewards programs steady but not necessarily richer and with cumulative inflation still embedded in everyday prices, rewards are less able to offset the psychological weight of a 20 percent plus APR. The preference for debit is therefore both rational and reversible. It is rational because it contains risk when rates are high. It is reversible because households have not lost access to credit, and the industry has not withdrawn lines in a disorderly way. That is a healthier dynamic than the cliff effects seen in prior cycles.
For policy-aware readers, the signal is straightforward. The consumer is moderating by choice, not collapsing from constraint. Revolving growth is slower, card delinquencies are stabilizing at slightly elevated levels, and charge-offs are drifting down from last year’s peaks. Debit’s regained lead over credit is a practical response to price, and it is reinforcing better behavior on minimum payments and balance carry. If the rate environment softens, some of this caution will unwind. If it does not, expect the same steady tilt toward transaction over financing. In either case, households and regulators are getting something they both claimed to want in 2023 and 2024, namely a return to more sustainable use of consumer credit. On balance, that is what this pullback is signaling.
So what does this mean for an individual plan. Treat card borrowing as a tactical, time-bound tool. If a balance exists, prioritize it against the highest-rate obligations first because the compounding cost is explicit and immediate. If you can toggle transactions toward debit without disrupting essential bill-paying automation, do so for a quarter and observe how your cash flow behaves. If rates fall later in the year, reassess the mix. Until then, the combination of slower revolving growth, steadier delinquency flow, and the legal status quo on fees argues for conservative use of unsecured revolving credit. The macro view may be about millions of accounts, but it is constructed from choices that look very much like yours.
This article uses the focus keyword Americans Pull Back From an Epic Credit-Card Binge to reflect the current U.S. credit behavior accurately and to help readers locate a policy-grounded analysis of the trend. The core takeaway is not that the consumer is weak. It is that the consumer is choosing to be more selective, at least until interest and fees look less punitive. That is a different kind of resilience, and it is the one showing up in the data.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
